Violet is the Future!
Well-known and
respected print luminary Andrew Tribute followed up his recent paper
on Violet CTP with an interesting commentary on the technology this
November. Published on the excellent What
They Think website it confirms violet should now be the first
(and future proof) choice for CTP for most commercial printers.
Briefly, this synopsis sums up violet CTP:
"Among other key points is that
violet technology is lower in cost to purchase, lower in cost and
more reliable to operate, higher in performance and has a better
future than thermal CtP."
SOS have been very
successful with violet CTP over the last few years, offering clients
an open system, NO tie-ins to any one manufacturers type of plate.
Call us now and see how we can take your forward. Whether upgrading
your old silver system or apprehensive about making the leap to CTP,
we can help advise and recommend a system to suit your company's
budget and production requirements. The full Tribute article is
printed below.
___________________________________________________________________________________
November 13, 2007 -- In October at the IFRA
newspaper exhibition in Vienna and in September at the IGAS
exhibition in Tokyo the next generation of CtP started. This was the
showing of the new chemistry free violet CtP plates we have been
looking forward to seeing since they were previewed at IPEX in 2005.
These new plates from both Agfa and Fujifilm were demonstrated at
these shows and to my understanding are to be officially launched
and become available at drupa in May 2008.
I'm well known as a supporter of violet CtP so why
do I think this is the next generation of CtP? I say this because I
regard the recent developments with both no process and chemistry
free thermal CtP plates as a sideways rather than a forward step in
CtP. This is because these plates are not totally suited to the
mainstream of CtP operations. They are too limited in what they do,
with most being too slow in operation, too expensive to be
competitive, and in certain cases not being good plates for the
press operator. The new chemistry free violet plates are very
different in that they are "no compromise" plates. That
means they don't require more imaging power, don't run slower than
standard violet CtP plates, have similar run lengths to standard
violet CtP plates, and provide comparable image quality to standard
CtP plates for both newspapers and commercial printers. They also
take out the only variable in the process of creating the plates,
namely the chemistry used for plate development.
Why I am a fan of the forthcoming violet
chemistry free plates is as stated before, that they are "no
compromise" plates. They can be imaged at the same speed on
the same CtP devices as used for standard violet CtP plates.
For more than two years we have had both no
process and chemistry free plates in the market using thermal
imaging technology. No process is as its name states a plate that
goes straight from the CtP device onto the press with no further
processing. These plates are the Kodak Thermal Direct and the
Fujifilm Brillia Pro-T. Chemistry free plates have an intermediate
process where they have a wash and gum operation before being
mounted on the press. These plates are the Agfa Azura and Presstek
Anthem Pro. The Anthem Pro does not need a gumming operation. Of
these plates I prefer the chemistry free approach for reasons I will
define. No process and chemistry free plates with the exception of
the Fuji Brillia Pro-T require almost three times the imaging power
as standard thermal CtP plates and consequently image much slower.
They also have limited run lengths in comparison with standard
thermal CtP plates and cost significantly more.
Personally I am not a fan of the no process plates
for a number of reasons. There is a very minimal visible image on
the plate and it is not possible to check its quality with a plate
reader. It is also difficult to check image quality or imposition
before mounting the plate on press. The image on the plate has a
very limited lifespan of around one hour after imaging in a normal
white light situation before being mounted on press. This prevents
making a plate sometime before printing unless the plate can be kept
in a totally dark storage area. There is also a potential problem of
fount solution contamination on the press. This is because the
unexposed areas of the plate are first softened by the fount
solution and then removed by the tack of the ink and deposited on
the first waste sheets. In certain cases a small amount of this
dissolved coating can feed back into the fount solution of the press
corrupting it and this can mean more frequent cleaning of the press.
These plates also cannot be baked if long press runs are required.
The plates also are not suited for use with UV curable inks because
they appear to be incompatible with UV solvents. I fully understand
the defined ecological benefits of not having to use water and
having no waste solutions to get rid of, but I don't think using a
press as a plate processing and cleaning system is an ideal
approach.
Among other key points is that violet
technology is lower in cost to purchase, lower in cost and more
reliable to operate, higher in performance and has a better future
than thermal CtP.
Why I am a fan of the forthcoming violet chemistry
free plates is as stated before, that they are "no
compromise" plates. They can be imaged at the same speed on the
same CtP devices as used for standard violet CtP plates. If
necessary the existing plate processors can be used for the final
heat wash and gum at the same speed as for chemistry-processed
plates. Just replace the developer with a gum solution. Otherwise a
special wash and gum unit can be used. The plates image at
high-speed and so are ideal for both newspapers and larger printers.
Also the plates print in exactly the same way as the current
conventional violet CtP plates so no change is required in the press
room. They are also quoted as having longer run lengths and can be
baked for extended runs. They also can be used with UV curable inks.
Among other key points, and I reiterate what I
have been saying for years, is that violet technology is lower in
cost to purchase, lower in cost and more reliable to operate, higher
in performance and has a better future than thermal CtP. At drupa,
as well as these new next generation violet chemistry free plates,
we will also see the next generation of violet CtP engines. These
will have twice the imaging power of today's CtP devices and this
means faster imaging of plates.
Today predominantly only smaller printers have
adopted the no process and chemistry free thermal plates where there
are low volume requirements for plates. Larger printers and
newspapers have found these plates to be uneconomical to use for
cost and performance reasons. Obviously this situation can change to
make the situation more attractive for higher volume plate users if
the suppliers bring down the prices of the plates. Violet chemistry
free plates and the forthcoming faster violet CtP engines can change
all this and make it economical and productively viable for the
larger printers and newspapers to start using these more
ecologically viable plate making processes.
ANDREW TRIBUTE

|